By Ramzy Baroud : African countries are challenging Israel's plot across the continent

**** Hamas armed wing says seven hostages killed in Gaza **** Netanyahu pessimistic regarding possibility of agreement Hamas **** As famine looms in Gaza, the US scrambles for solutions **** Injured survivors of Gaza aid chaos say Israeli forces shot at them **** Hamas: ‘International community failing to protect Gaza’s children from starvation’ **** US prevents Security Council statement holding Israel responsible for Al-Rashid Street massacre **** Israeli report reveals suffering of soldiers in Gaza **** To save Israel: The US is destroying the international system it once constructed **** Gaza Health Ministry: Thousands at risk of death in northern Gaza Strip due to drought, malnutrition **** Municipality: Israeli aggression destroyed the communication and computer control system **** Risk of death threatens half a million Palestinians in northern Gaza **** Palestinians will lose 2024’s olive harvest if Israel continues blocking access to land **** UN: Israeli army systematically blocks access to people in need in Gaza **** Infants in northern Gaza at dangerous stage due to drought and malnutrition **** Two Palestinians injured, one kidnaped in IOF raid in Qalqilya **** British Home Secretary urges protesters to end Gaza rallies, claiming they have ‘made their point’ **** Lapid: ‘Netanyahu’s Biden disagreement harms Israel’s security, foreign relations’ **** PA demands that Israel should cover Gaza reconstruction costs **** Egypt condemns targeting of UNRWA **** UN: No aid convoys in northern Gaza since 23 January

African countries are challenging Israel's plot across the continent

2023-03-25

By Ramzy Baroud

284

Articles

The sight of Israeli Ambassador Sharon Bar-Li and other Israeli delegates being escorted out of the opening ceremony of the African Union Summit in Addis Ababa on 18 February was historic. The very moment that was meant to crown twenty years of Israeli diplomacy on the African continent turned within a few seconds to represent Israel's failure in Africa.

Unable to fathom the breakdown of its diplomatic and political efforts, Tel Aviv responded to Bar-Li's removal with a war of words against African countries, accusing them of spearheading a campaign aimed at blocking Israel's observer status. Referring to a "small number of extremist states like South Africa and Algeria," a spokesperson for the Israeli foreign ministry alluded to a plot, supposedly hatched by Iran, and carried out by African governments that are "driven by hate" for Israel.

The undiplomatic nature of the ministry's language is a major shift compared to the upbeat, diplomatic rhetoric used by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visited Africa to speak at the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in Liberia in 2017. "Israel is coming back to Africa," said Netanyahu, "and Africa is coming back to Israel." He added with a theatrical flourish and emphasis on each syllable: "I believe in Africa."

Netanyahu's reference to "coming back to Africa" was intended to underscore two points: Israel's diplomatic and political return to Africa; and an imagined return to the continent as a representation of a shared historical experience.

On the latter, Netanyahu had made various references to some drummed-up, shared anti-colonial struggle between Israel and African countries. "Africa and Israel share a natural affinity," he claimed in his ECOWAS speech. "We have, in many ways, similar histories. Your nations toiled under foreign rule. You experienced horrific wars and slaughters. This is very much our history."

The diplomatic "return", on the other hand, is more real than imagined. However, the diplomatic ties between Israel and many African countries, starting with Ghana in 1956, took place under unique historical circumstances, in which many African countries were still colonized, semi-independent or largely reliant on their former colonizers. For example, Ghana-Israel relations started when Ghana was still called Gold Coast. In fact, the diplomatic accords with Tel Aviv at the time only took place when Gold Coast received official approval from Britain, because it was still a British colony.

Before 1973, Israel had full diplomatic ties with 33 African countries. Much of this changed in October of the same year. When Arab countries fought a war against Israel's colonial expansion, many African countries broke ties with Israel in favor of maintaining their truly historic, economic and spiritual ties with their Arab brethren. It was no wonder that it was the Organization of African Unity — the precursor to the African Union — that first identified Israel's founding ideology, Zionism, as a form of racism in its 12th ordinary session held in Kampala in 1975.

The so-called "peace process" and the signing of the Oslo Accords between Palestinian leaders and Israel weakened the stalwart African position towards Palestine, not out of enmity to the Palestinians but due to western pressure, and the misconception that peace and justice had finally arrived in Occupied Palestine. It was against this very backdrop that Netanyahu visited Africa and began his campaign for normalization with many African countries.

Israel's motives in Africa are clear: economic benefits and political dividends, particularly pro-Israel votes at the UN. Years after Israel's "return to Africa", though, the continent has neither benefited from the lofty promises made by Tel Aviv to revitalize local economies and fight desertification, nor, as a bloc, has it significantly changed its votes at the UN, which tend to be in favor of Palestinian rights.

Nevertheless, for Netanyahu, the benefits outweigh the disappointments, especially as Tel Aviv fully understands that Africa, more than ever since the Berlin Conference in 1884, has once again become a major contested geopolitical space. That's where the breakdown of Israel's calculations happened, thus the humiliating episode in Addis Ababa.

Following the removal of the Israeli delegates, Tel Aviv continued to make a case based on technical grounds: that the Israeli ambassador had the proper accreditation; that Israel was officially an observer member of the AU; and so on.

Israel's observer status has caused a rift among AU members. Approval was given unilaterally by the Chair of the AU Commission, Moussa Faki Mahamat, in July 2021. As the news spread about Mahamat's personal decision, many countries protested, and the status was frozen, pending a decision based on a proper democratic process.

Just two days after the Israeli delegation was removed from the summit, the AU — in fact, Mahamat himself — announced to reporters on 20 February that Israel's membership status "is suspended until such time as this committee can deliberate." He asserted that, "We did not invite Israeli officials to our summit."

The Israeli response to all of this reflected a general sense of confusion, if not desperation within Israeli diplomatic circles. African countries, however, followed the incident with a clear policy position, delineating that the decision to suspend Israeli membership was not a technical or procedural one. It was, in the words of Clayson Monyela, head of public diplomacy in South Africa's Department of International Relations, "an issue of principle".

Three weeks after the AU decision, the South African parliament voted in favor of a motion that downgrades the country's embassy in Tel Aviv to a mere liaison office. That, too, was a matter of principle, namely as a "first step" that aims to pressure Israel "to comply with human rights, recognize the rights of the Palestinian people (and) their right to exist."

As geopolitical spaces open for countries in the Global South due to changing global power dynamics, more countries are daring to step up to challenge the hegemony of former colonial powers. Considering their history of valiant anti-colonial struggles, it is no surprise that African countries are leading this momentum toward national and regional independence.

Ultimately, it took only six years for Africa to prove Netanyahu wrong; to prove that the settler-colonial state of Israel "did not return to Africa". What is true, however, is that Africa itself is returning to its anti-colonial roots.

Share This Article

No Comments

Dear

Dear visitor, be the first to comment on this article. Enter your information, and leave a comment. All information will be treated with confidentiality.
Welcome to Group194.Net

Please abide by discussion etiquette.

Name *

Email *

Country

Comment *

Code*

Social Media

Tweets by @group194

Refugee's Sites Friends Readers Contributions Palestine before 1948 camps in Lebanon Directory of camps in Syria camps in Gaza strip camps in Jordan camps in West Bank About Us Contact Us

Top